ExpatToolsStart planning
HOUSING DECISION WORKSHEET

Compare housing offers before choosing a destination

The lower rent can need more cash, cost more over your stay, or depend on an unconfirmed bill. Compare those questions separately.

Published by Nicolas Griss-Trempe · How this was made · Updated

Compare your housing offers

Set one comparison before collecting prices

Write down the same dates, household size, accommodation type and essential requirements for every offer. A furnished private home for six months is a different purchase from a room advertised at a nightly rate. Compare the actual payable term, including any minimum commitment, rather than multiplying a promotional first month.

  • Use one currency: retain the original quote and record the conversion cost separately. A currency label does not convert amounts. Use an actual transfer quote if you need to fund a payment abroad.
  • Define the same bill basket: rent, recurring property charges, heating, electricity, water and internet. Record what is included, fixed, capped or based on usage. Avoid adding a bill already included in rent.
  • Separate spending and tied-up cash: non-refundable setup spending contributes to cost. A refundable deposit reduces available cash while it is held; its return and any deductions need their own record.
  • Set hard constraints: lawful stay and work, employer permission, accessibility, household needs and usable working hours. A low total does not override an unresolved condition.

The result below compares housing only. Add food, travel, health cover, tax and other household spending in your monthly worksheet. Do not treat a housing total as the complete cost of a destination.

Case study: three explicitly fictional offers

These are invented arithmetic examples, not listings, current market prices or recommendations. All use EUR for one adult in the same type of furnished private home, from 1 November 2026 through 30 April 2027: six monthly payments. The example assumes the same essential housing requirements can be met. The fixed bill bundles in A and B cover the same items. C has not supplied those bill amounts.

One currency, the same six-month stay
ItemOffer AOffer BOffer C
Monthly rent1,0001,100950
Monthly bills150, fixed100, fixedUnknown: U
Total monthly housing1,1501,200950 + U
Non-refundable setup spending600150150
Refundable deposit tied up2,000600600
Cash required through move-in3,7501,9501,700 + U
Six-month non-refundable cost7,5007,3505,850 + 6U

Cash through move-in includes setup spending, the deposit and the first month's full housing payment. It is not six months' rent in advance. Six-month cost includes six housing payments plus setup spending, excluding the refundable deposit. The examples assume no rent increases, transfer charges, cancellation charges or deposit deductions; add any that apply to your offer.

Different answers to different questions

B has the higher rent, but needs 1,800 less cash through move-in and costs 150 less over this six-month stay. C cannot be ranked from its advertised rent while its bills are unknown.

Check the cost and the break-even point

  • Monthly housing: rent + separately payable recurring bills.
  • Cash through move-in: non-refundable setup + refundable deposit + housing payments due by move-in.
  • Cost over M months: non-refundable setup + M × monthly housing, plus other non-refundable charges for that term.

For A, six-month cost is 600 + 6 × 1,150 = 7,500. For B, it is 150 + 6 × 1,200 = 7,350. Do not add the first month a second time: it is already one of the six monthly payments.

A saves 50 per month on recurring housing, but starts with 450 more non-refundable setup spending. Its cost difference against B after M months is 450 − 50M. The cost break-even is 450 ÷ 50 = 9 months; both would cost 10,950 then. That is beyond this six-month quote. It matters only if both offers can continue at unchanged terms, which must be confirmed separately.

A also ties up 1,400 more deposit cash. Dividing that difference by the monthly saving gives 28 months, but that is not the cost break-even: it mixes a potentially refundable amount with spending and ignores the setup difference. Keep deposit amount, refund conditions and refund timing separate. A deduction would add to actual cost; a delayed refund can cause a cash gap even without a deduction.

If one offer has both lower recurring costs and lower non-refundable setup costs, no positive cost break-even is needed under those assumptions. If the monthly difference is zero, setup costs are not recovered through a monthly saving. Recalculate when a contract term or bill changes.

Payment dates can rule out the cheaper monthly offer

Continue the invented A/B case with 2,500 earmarked for housing payments on 19 October, after setting aside non-housing bills and a protected reserve. A's deposit and setup are due on 20 October; B's are due on 31 October. Both first monthly housing payments are due on 1 November. A further 2,400 is available on 5 November. No borrowing or deposit refund is assumed.

Fictional housing cash balances in EUR
Date and eventA: change → balanceB: change → balance
19 October: opening housing cash2,5002,500
20 October: A deposit and setup−2,600 → −1000 → 2,500
31 October: B deposit and setup0 → −100−750 → 1,750
1 November: first monthly housing payment−1,150 → −1,250−1,200 → 550
5 November: money becomes available+2,400 → 1,150+2,400 → 2,950

A is short by 100 on its first payment date and by 1,250 before the later money arrives. Its positive balance on 5 November does not pay the earlier bills on time. B stays above zero in this housing-only schedule. With the same 2,500 available, A requires another 1,250 before the relevant deadlines or confirmed changes to the payment schedule.

Do not use an expected refund from a previous landlord to close that gap unless its amount and payment date are confirmed. Put all household bills, arrival costs, paydays and confirmed refunds into the dated cash-flow planner; the housing-only table cannot show the full household's lowest balance.

Turn an unknown bill into a decision threshold

C's six-month cost is 150 + 6 × (950 + U) = 5,850 + 6U, where U is a constant monthly bill assumption applied unchanged in all six months of each scenario. Setting this equal to B's 7,350 gives U = 250 per month. Below 250, C has the lower six-month housing cost under the other unchanged assumptions; above 250, B does. This is a question to resolve, not a prediction of C's bills.

Invented bill scenarios for C, not estimated market prices
C bills per monthMonthly housingCash through move-inSix-month cost
1001,0501,8006,450
2501,2001,9507,350
3001,2502,0007,650

If bills vary, use the actual first payment when calculating arrival cash and the sum of scheduled bills for the six-month cost. Do not substitute a period average for the bill due at move-in.

Ask for the included services, any usage cap, how excess use is charged, seasonal assumptions, connection charges and payment dates. Record the source and its date. Keep the total marked provisional until those terms are clear. A single average can support a cost scenario, but actual seasonal bills still belong on their actual dates in your cash plan.

Copy a full offer-evidence record

Download blank housing comparison (.csv)

The download is a blank evidence record, not an automatic calculator. Use the formulas above to compare your completed offers.

Copy this block into your own private notes and complete one record per offer. Keep the same comparison dates and scope in every record. Use Unknown where evidence is missing; a blank does not mean zero. Do not put identity documents or bank credentials in a shared comparison.

OFFER ID / DESTINATION:
Property and household specification:
Required dates / number of payable months:
Minimum commitment / extension terms:
Original quote currency / planning currency:
Quote URL or written reference / provider:
Quote received / checked / expires:

RECURRING COSTS
Rent / payment frequency / due dates:
Recurring property charges:
Utilities, heating and internet included:
Separate bills / fixed, capped or usage-based:
Unknown bill range / evidence behind the range:
Monthly total / confirmed or provisional:

ARRIVAL AND REFUNDABLE CASH
Non-refundable setup items / amounts / due dates:
Deposit amount / due date / who holds it:
Refund conditions / possible deductions:
Refund timing / source confirming that timing:
Other advance payments / period they cover:
Transfer charges / quote date / recipient amount:

CONTRACT AND HARD CONSTRAINTS
Cancellation before arrival / refund amounts / deadlines:
Early exit / notice / continuing payment obligations:
Landlord or agent identity / authority to let checked:
Official local tenancy guidance / date checked:
Residence and work route / official source / unresolved checks:
Employer approval / household and access requirements:
Working-hours fit / date used for the check:

COMPARISON RESULT
Cash required through move-in / payment dates:
Non-refundable cost for the same stay:
Deposit excluded from that cost / refund uncertainty:
Cash available after other bills and protected reserve:
Lowest dated balance / extra cash needed / deadline:
Bill or term that would change the decision:
Open question / person to ask / response deadline:
Decision / evidence still required before paying:

Attach the quoted terms to the record. When an offer changes, update both its cost and its payment dates. Keep an expired quote as history rather than treating it as a current offer.

Make a decision you can explain

For this six-month example, B has a lower confirmed cost than A and fits the stated housing cash schedule. C could cost less, but its missing bills can reverse the comparison. The next useful action is to resolve C's bill terms, not declare its headline rent the winner. A becomes competitive over a longer unchanged term, but its early payment gap still has to be funded.

Before paying, separately check your right to stay and perform the intended work, employer permission and the actual contract. Use the payment-commitment checklist. Check any required working-hours overlap separately with your employer.

Tenancy conditions need jurisdiction-specific checks. For England, GOV.UK's private-renting guidance explains that tenancy type affects the rules, and its deposit-protection guidance is an official starting point. Those rules are not a worldwide template. For eligible EU citizens, Your Europe's residence guidance is a separate starting point for residence checks.

Official entry points checked 7 October 2026. The calculations and invented offers are ExpatTools examples. They do not verify a landlord, establish legal eligibility or guarantee that a deposit will be refunded.